Web Applications Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for power users of web applications. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I uploaded a 1280x720 AVI file encoded at 8000 kb/s to youtube. It takes a long time to upload. I uploaded another 1280x720 AVI file encoded at 4000 kb/s, and I don't see any difference in quality. Is there a difference in quality or not? Is 8000 kb/s too much? What about 4000 kb/s? What's the best bitrate to use?

share|improve this question

migrated from superuser.com Jan 13 '11 at 9:38

This question came from our site for computer enthusiasts and power users.

Youtube performs transcoding to its own formats to optimize for bandwidth, so as long as the quality is better than those, you would see no difference in quality.

share|improve this answer

I believe youtube's bitrate for 720p videos is around 2Mbps, so at 4Mbps you should be fine. Since they do there own encoding it's preferable you upload it at the original bitrate since the time you take to convert it's probably the same you spend uploading.

share|improve this answer
So are you saying that I should use 8Mbps instead of 4Mbps, or it doesn't matter since 4Mbps is still higher than 2Mbps? – z-buffer Jan 30 '11 at 0:25

8000 kb/s too much?

8000 kb/s would mean that the client would require a similar bandwidth to stream it without any problems. Obviously, that's a bit too high. There's no "best" bitrate as such - I often use a bitrate of ~ 600 Kb/s so that a person with a 512k connection can stream it pretty much instantaneously.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.