Take the 2-minute tour ×
Web Applications Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for power users of web applications. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is what Flickr's FAQs have to say about collections:

How is a collection different than a set?

A set contains photos. A collection can contain sets (or other collections).

Isn't this just sets of sets?

Yes, but no. It's better.

Can anyone clarify for me why it's better? I'm sure everyone uses them differently; I'm just having a hard time figuring out why you'd need them, and the FAQ is not exactly helpful.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 5 down vote accepted

If going deeper and wider is better, then that's why it's better. That's really all there is to it.

A collection can contain sets and other collections, going down as five (5) deep. That is you can have the following nests/groups:

Animals collection

  • Four-legged set
  • Domestic pets set
  • Winged creatures collection

Winged creatures collection

  • Pegasus set
  • Birds of prey set

Edible collection

  • Animals collection
  • Winged creatures collection

Think of them like Gmail labels. An email can have multiple labels as can Flickr sets/collections be in more than one collection.

It's a superset of another way to organise your Flickr photos.

share|improve this answer
    
Unicorns don't have wings; you're possibly thinking of Pagasuses (pagasim?). Which, however, are notoriously camera-shy, and lack horns. –  Michael Paulukonis Mar 14 at 20:15
    
Correct, was thinking of the Pegasus type beast –  Eight Days of Malaise Mar 14 at 20:35
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.