Take the 2-minute tour ×
Web Applications Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for power users of web applications. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is it possible to set the "urgent" flag in Gmail for outgoing mail? I'd like to be able to flag time-sensitive emails as such.

share|improve this question
    
Personally, I think this (inability to set the urgent flag on outgoing mail) is a pretty compelling advantage. Let the recipient decide if your email is indeed urgent. –  Bruno Morency Aug 22 '10 at 19:37
    
This. You could set the urgent flag all you want, but the recipient could still read your email only a week later, or, in fact, never. If, on the other hand, he expects an urgent email from you, he'd be constantly watching his inbox anyway, give or take the urgent flag. –  RegDwight Aug 22 '10 at 20:02
    
And its not too hard to write URGENT: at the start of the subject line (together with a concise subject that explains the topic and urgency. However I always remember that one man's urgency is another man's is another man's file for later reading. –  GAThrawn Aug 23 '10 at 12:05
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 8 down vote accepted

Interesting.

I tested by sending an email to my Gmail acct from an Exchange account, and setting the flag urgent. Then I looked at the email in the web interface and from Outlook. In Outlook (getting Gmail) I saw the message flagged urgent. In the Web interface, I saw no urgent indication.

I replied to the message from the web interface and from Outlook. In the web interface, the urgent flag was not shown, and did not make it back to the Exchange account. In Outlook, the reply did not have the urgent flag activated, but when I activated it it was visible back on the Exchange account.

So, to summarize .. the Gmail web interface does not recognize the urgent flag, at least not as implemented by Microsoft Exchange. But the Gmail engine does not lose the header data when it is provided by another client.

As an aside .. I find the urgent flag far more irritation than it is worth. Rarely does "urgent" to you mean that it should be "urgent" to me. When is the last time that you received a message flagged "low priority"?

IMHO it is far better to indicate in the subject and body that the issue is urgent or time-sensitive.

EDIT: Google just added (1-Sept-2010) the "Priority Inbox" functionality and some kind of importance measure. I will redo my tests and update.

share|improve this answer
    
"low priority" gets used a bit within my team for informational stuff that doesn't suit our other comms media. I have a folder rule that keeps it out of my inbox, and I catch up with it either on the train or the next morning. I like it. –  William Aug 23 '10 at 6:56
    
I too use the "low priority" flag in Outlook, similarily to what @William receives. Guess there is pockets of use. –  user66001 Jul 12 '13 at 15:45
    
I use "low priority" all the time. Our team uses it for "working from home" and "out sick" emails. I also frequently use "low priority" for emails that just amount to "thank you." –  Naliba yesterday
add comment

It's not possible using the web interface. I haven't tried with IMAP, but I assume it would honour an Urgent flag if set in your email client.

share|improve this answer
    
But if the recipient was using the gmail web interface, he wouldn't get it. –  thunderror Aug 22 '10 at 17:00
    
Agreed, it's mostly pointless flagging urgent if you don't know the recipient's mail client. –  William Aug 23 '10 at 6:57
    
Even with Thunderbird, if you set the priority flags, the gmail interface does nothing. –  BGM Jan 30 at 23:06
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.