Take the 2-minute tour ×
Web Applications Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for power users of web applications. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What are some reasons why people would prefer to retweet a message using the old style (RT @someone: Blah blah blah) instead of the new style where it just "forwards" the message to your followers? I can't see an actual benefit to using the old way or am I missing something?

Obviously I am talking about tweets that aren't supplemented with some sort of an additional comment.

Edited for betterness

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by phwd Sep 13 '12 at 18:09

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

3  
This is pretty much unanswerable, as you'd have to ask each and every person, though I'd guess a lot of it has to do with control and habit. –  ChrisF Oct 1 '10 at 19:20
    
I agree with @ChrisF this is open ended and without conclusion. You would be better off discussing this via any of the social media blogs. –  phwd Oct 1 '10 at 19:26
    
I don't agree. There are likely very technical reasons why some people do it. I just use the regular interface so I'm not familiar with other interfaces –  Joe Philllips Oct 1 '10 at 19:46
    
I dont twitter but what is the new way? I'll just assume theres no benefit from using the new way even if it happens to be less timing (once again i dont use twitter) –  acidzombie24 Oct 2 '10 at 6:33

8 Answers 8

up vote 4 down vote accepted

You can only RT people who have protected accounts by the old RT method.

share|improve this answer

Technical Answer: The old RT method is easier to implement because, well, it's already been implemented for two years.

Philosphical Answer: Some people don't like how native retweets look because there's an unfamiliar face in their stream. The small retweeted by text isn't enough to make people comfortable with strange people in their home streams.

NobodyCaresist Answer: People want to comment on RTs for some reason.

share|improve this answer
1  
+1 for the philosophical answer. I agree. –  kchau Oct 1 '10 at 22:59

The new RT API doesn't allow you to add a comment to the tweet your retweeting. So you can't do something like This is awesome! RT @twitter #newtwitter is live!

share|improve this answer
1  
I've made a note about this in my question already. A lot of people do not put a comment in –  Joe Philllips Oct 1 '10 at 22:25

It might have to do with twitter clients, for example, in Netvibes the retweet button does it just like you're telling us.

share|improve this answer
    
Random factoid: the Twitter API also returns the list of retweets as "RT <rest of msg>" when client apps make a call to get them, even when the RT was made using the new RT method. –  kchau Oct 1 '10 at 20:19
    
@kchau at least the part that fits into 140 chars (which is pretty often a problem with older apps, because the last few characters often belong to the link that the whole tweet is about) –  balpha Oct 1 '10 at 20:31

I've used twitter since 2008 so back then most people used RT in their tweets and if they're using SMS to RT a tweet, it's most likely out of habit. And I often do that too. Also, twitter's been redoing a lot of features and most people don't even keep up with that.

share|improve this answer
    
So you think it's because most people don't use the twitter.com interface? I know that one only has the new RT functionality –  Joe Philllips Oct 1 '10 at 19:44
    
To be honest, I use the Twitter client for Android (official) and it just puts RT. Not sure if that's what the new RT engine does. –  Muhammad Usman Oct 2 '10 at 1:08

I use both -- the new RT when I just want to RT, but the old RT when I want to add my 2c to the tweet, as zigdon said.

share|improve this answer
    
Yes, I do the same thing. It makes sense to do it that way. –  Joe Philllips Oct 2 '10 at 2:38

The old version of RT is better for adding commentary to the tweet... if you do the new RT you can't add any additional text to the tweet. Additionally, there might be reasons you want people to see the tweet coming from you instead of from the original source.

share|improve this answer

The new RT was an attempt by twitter to narrow down the amount of tweets on their servers, which I think gives you the answer.

If you use the old method it is your tweet and you are giving someone else credit for the content.

The new style is you linking to someone else's tweet.

Personally I am far more likely to read something by someone I actually follow and if I like what they have RT'd I will check out the profile of the person who they RT'd

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.