2

I'm looking for a filter that would look something like:

in:inbox in:unread not in:spam

Specifically, I'm looking for not in: syntax, but can't figure out how that might spell.

Please, help.

1

You proposed this:

in:inbox in:unread not in:spam

The first fix is that instead of the word no you use a "-". That means the syntax is:

in:inbox in:unread -in:spam

The second fix is that the -in:spam is not needed.

If a message/conversation has the inbox label then is doesn't have the spam label. Now if the "-in:spam" was just an example then your search will return all unread messages/conversations that have the inbox label but do not have the other label.

| improve this answer | |
  • True, it's just... the category I looked for contained 0 items, so fuzzy search started suggesting stuff from the spam section. Thanks! – Boris Burkov Mar 10 at 13:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.