Is there a way to use the NOT operator on Amazon?
I'm trying to find books, and am finding it very frustrating to be unable to filter out books I don't want based on author or subject.
Web Applications Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for power users of web applications. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityUPDATE: This feature does NOT work as of June 2019.
You can use the minus sign (-
) in front of the terms you want to exclude from the search results.
For example: stephen king -dark
I found that adding the item to be excluded wrapped in () makes the NOT operator work
i.e. gem (-rocks)
will return a search where rocks was excluded
above would be: stephen king (-dark)
ECC -"NON-ECC" -"NON ECC" -"non-ECC" -"Non-ECC"
STILL returns boat loads of product titles containing "NON-ECC" making it feel almost impossible to find ecc ram.
Dec 13, 2016 at 7:22
-
sign trick does not work anymore : "Quick Charge" -Type -"USB C"
Unfortunately, Amazon does not regard the NOT operator anymore (negative keyword search).
Workaround: use Google Search with for example:
site:amazon.com lightbulbs -led
This will give you all lightbulbs that are not LED.
Of course, you don't have the sorting-order of Amazon's search engine anymore. But it serves the purpose.
However, with Google Search you can get latest products by using the after:yyyy-mm-dd
search parameter.
Example:
site:amazon.com lightbulbs -led after:2021-01-01
site:amazon
from the internet search. Brilliant answer with the after:
param though, thanks. :thumbs-up:
Feb 19 at 4:04
LED
Jul 12 at 3:56
As of July 2015, at least there is no reliable way to use a NOT operator.
At least on Amazon.de searching for hard drive -usb
will reduce the number of USB drives, but already the last result on the first page contained "USB" in the title.
Searching for tischventilator -usb
(German for table fan) on the other hand pushes usb devices even more to the top of the result list than just searching for tischventilator
.
On Amazon.com again, adding -usb
to table fan
has the intended effect.
Thanks to this answer, I've discovered that amazon respects + before a keyword too!
For example: Radeon +7990 will give you exactly 7990's results and not variations on models like 6990 or 7970 like it normally does.
+
to a search term just assigns extra weight to that term, rather than acting as a Boolean operator that excludes all non-matching results. So, non-matching results do still show up, and still frustratingly often; just not as often as if +
weren't used. (I guess Amazon is using some kind of fuzzy logic for its search engine. Whatever the underlying reasoner is doing, though, it is doing it badly. Amazon's search engine is awful.)
[
]
but you are using parenthesis(
)
. Which do you mean?