3

I love Dropbox. But Dropbox for Teams seems most appropriate for Teams with few members and a lot of data. I'm working with a team that has lots of members, but not much data, so the Dropbox pricing seems high.

Does anybody have a recommendation for a file synchronization server for teams with lots of people, but not a lot of data (<50GB)?

Improve this question
2
  • How many is 'lots of users'?
    – Clare Macrae
    Oct 26, 2011 at 20:02
  • What does your team do?
    – R.K.
    Jan 13, 2012 at 1:08

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
0

I would rather suggest a different approach. Get a VPS (Linode is good, and you'll get 20 GB ~ $200 yearly) and setup rsync. You are not very clear on your requirements, but if it is just for syncing between different users then this approach is good. Plus you can add remove unlimited users.

Improve this answer
0

If you have really a lot of people, but not much data, you might want to look into rolling your own solution on top of Amazon S3. See for example, this SuperUser topic, or using software like SyncAny (to be released soon).

Improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.