This goes down to how Google indexed the pages and do they consider '[something' as a word on its own.
Normally during indexing, texts goes through a process called tokenisation which breaks texts into individual words. Symbols are normally removed in this process. In some rare cases, however, the symbol is part of the word, so special cases must be added to keep those symbols during tokenisation. Obviously they can't really maintain all the special cases manually, so they probably did some data mining in search queries and webpages to see which words when accompanied by certain symbols seem to mean something totally different.
For example, if you search C#
the result will be different from C
, but the results are the same for net
and .net
, ke ha
and ke$ha
. Since people would rarely search for net
or ke ha
alone, not treating them as special cases will probably speed up indexing.
In your case, very few people has probably searched for [something
before and even if they did, their behaviour probably indicated that the results for something
were also relevant, so [something
would have never made to the special cases list and will be indexed as something
in their databases.
Thus it's probably not possible.
[avirk
,"[avirk"
,"[avirk]"
and[avirk]
and yes I got the result. Now it could be possible that "something" is not recorded anywhere on Google. – avirk Jun 9 '12 at 18:20"[avirk"
is example that I'm getting result and also "[something" gives the result on Google. What error you are getting its not clear yet to me? Is Google saysthere is nothing matched to your query
or a blank page? – avirk Jun 9 '12 at 18:39