54

I'm trying to find mails that have one address in the recipients but another not in it.

I'm trying things like from:address1@gmail.com and not from:address2@gmail.com and from:(address1@gmail.com and not address2@gmail.com)

None of them work, and I can't find a good help page about boolean operators either.

Anyone has any idea?

  • Actually, your search doesn’t make much sense—you can’t receive an email from more than one recipient, so form: someone but-not-from: someone else can’t really work. You are probably trying to search for emails that were sent only to a restricted group of recipients. – Alex Sep 24 '12 at 12:29
61

The 'or' function in Gmail is represented by 'OR,' and the 'not' function is represented by a minus (-). You also can use quotes (" ") to specify an exact phrase.

From the Gmail help page on Boolean operators.

  • And the AND operator? Does just adding 2 restrictions make it an AND by default? – Steven Roose Sep 24 '12 at 12:15
  • 5
    AND is the default. – Asa Aug 14 '13 at 14:42
  • 3
    I have the feeling that the default is OR, because I got results from both words not together – logoff Oct 11 '16 at 8:25
  • 2
    The robustness is pretty awesome actually, and you can negate whole subexpressions; I frequently search unread email not from a list of senders: is:unread -{ from:a from:b ... } – Dan Lugg May 1 '17 at 15:05
  • Note that you need to use double quotes " when specifying exact phrases. I got weird results using single quotes '. – Tim Malone Jun 28 '17 at 0:17
12

Use the minus sign to make a negative rule. You can also string rules together by just leaving a space between separate rules.

For example:

from:name@company.com -from:name2@company.com

or you can do things like

is:unread -in:spam -in:trash
6

For not in Google, use -, like so:

from:addres1@gmail.com -address2@gmail.com
  • 1
    from:-address@example.com doesn't seem to work for me when there are multiple messages in the same "conversation". Since SOME of those messages were NOT from address@example.com, it consider it a match and moves the ENTIRE conversation, even though one of the messages WAS from address@example.com so I would like the entire conversation to stay in the inbox... It's really tricky when Gmail tries to group things into conversations based on message similarity of subject/body! I wish the REPLIES to these messages could show up in my inbox even though the ORIGINALS got archived... – Tyler Rick Dec 27 '12 at 18:36
4

This will work:

from:@company1.com -address2@company1.com

This puts all messages from any sender at company1.com into a folder except those from the individual address2@compay1.com.

  • This is exactly what I was looking for and works great! I'm not sure why someone downvoted you. – Hexxagonal Dec 9 '15 at 16:01
3

when trying to avoid multiple phrases in a subject line for selection:

-("phrase one" OR "phrase two" OR "word1")
  • This is the best answer. You can combine with brackets like this: -from:(gmail.com OR google.com) This will filter all emails from anybody at gmail.com or google.com – user643011 Jul 4 '18 at 12:52
  • 1
    Is this equivalent to -{"phrase one" "phrase two" "word1"}? – Marcel Wilson Jan 22 at 18:38
  • @MarcelWilson it is not the same, having the OR in between the words is required logic. – Peter W Feb 5 at 15:10
  • I'm confused then. My understanding of the curly braces is all items contained within are OR'ed. While the parenthesis is a grouping, which if all items are OR'ed would mean they would be equivalent? Am I being dense? – Marcel Wilson Feb 5 at 15:15
  • 1
    @MarcelWilson I spoke too soon - you are correct, I wasn't paying attention to the curly braces. According to the documentation curly braces replace the need for OR inside of parentheses. – Peter W Feb 5 at 16:46

protected by Community May 17 '18 at 0:44

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.