2

This question already has an answer here:

I want to see in the search results only pages with the phrase "cross fade". Here's what I tried and some results I got:

"cross fade" (surrounded by quotes): received pages with: Crossfade (no space).

"cross fade" - crossfade (i.e. same as above, minus crossfade: cross-fade, 'cross, fade'.

I want to get only the exact phrase.

marked as duplicate by ale, jonsca Jan 14 '14 at 0:59

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

migrated from superuser.com Jan 13 '14 at 15:48

This question came from our site for computer enthusiasts and power users.

  • Why is my question marked as duplicate? Where is the similar question? – gil_mo Jan 14 '14 at 7:00
  • Maybe someone Google'd your question title in quotes but didn't check that the any of 20,000,000 results actually contained the exact phrase :D – Mark K Cowan Jan 9 '17 at 16:51
2

Google likes to guess what you are searching for and it decides you must be looking for corssfade instead of cross fade :(

(I'm almost getting Clippy flashbacks with that:)

You can overrule Google by doing the following:

  • Click Search tools
  • Choose All Results and change it in Verbatim

I know, it's a pain. You can also add &tbs=li:1 to your search string:
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22cross+fade%22&tbs=li:1

If you make a shortcut to https://www.google.com/search?tbs=li:1 you will start the search with the Verbatim option already set.


enter image description here

(also a source)

  • Thanks for the try, but even with your suggestions you still get "crossfade", "cross-fade" etc. – gil_mo Jan 13 '14 at 15:46
  • Did you get this screen? With the Did you mean: "crossfade" at the top? Then this is as close you can get to the "Exact Search" with Google. Google will always take individual words and incorporate them in the search (even if you choose "Exact Search"). You could still combine it with -crossfade (like this but you'll always get mixed results. – Rik Jan 13 '14 at 15:53
  • That's exactly what I'm getting, and as you can see the majority of the instances in bold are not what I was looking for (only the two ones you marked are). Is there maybe a non-google search that would fulfill my humble request? Or did I hit upon some super advanced technological barrier? (bitter grin). – gil_mo Jan 13 '14 at 16:05
  • My initial quest was to do a 'google test' and compare 'cross fade' to 'crossfade' in terms of result count. – gil_mo Jan 13 '14 at 16:06
  • I would almost say... [Bing](www.bing.com) (ieks). But even Bing stumbles on Cross fade :( Yeah... you hit on some advanced (defective) mind-reading by the search engines. You could look at the suggestions in the possible duplicate from the comments. With Google the + doesn't work but with Bing you get somewhat better results. But i don't think you can use them to compare to "Crossfade" like you intended. – Rik Jan 13 '14 at 16:15

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.